Background: Procurement of cytologic samples by brushing is common practice
at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) but has low sensi
tivity for cancer detection. Limited data are available on other techniques
, including endoluminal fine-needle aspiration and forceps biopsy. This ser
ies reviews the yield of these three stricture sampling methods.
Methods: In this prospective study, patients with biliary obstruction with
a clinical suspicion of malignancy underwent triple-tissue sampling at one
ERCP session. Final cancer diagnosis was based on all sampling methods plus
surgery, autopsy, and clinical follow-up. Tissue specimens were reported a
s normal, atypia, or malignant.
Results: A total of 133 patients were evaluated: 104 had cancer and 29 had
benign strictures. Tissue sampling sensitivity varied according to the type
of cancer; the highest yield was seen in ampullary cancers (62% to 85%). T
he cumulative sensitivity of triple-tissue sampling in the cancer patients
was as follows: sensitivity was 52% if atypia was considered benign and 77%
if it was considered malignant. The addition of a second or third techniqu
e increased sensitivity rates in most instances. No serious complications o
ccurred from the tissue sampling methods.
Conclusions: Tissue sampling sensitivity varied according to the type of ca
ncer. Combining a second or third method increased sensitivity; general use
of at least two sampling methods is therefore recommended.