This paper evaluates current knowledge of Laurentide eskers in Canada in th
e light of developments in glacier hydrology and glacial sedimentology. Que
stions regarding the morpho-sedimentary relations of eskers, the synchronei
ty and operation of R-channel systems, the role of supraglacial meltwater i
nput and proglacial water bodies, the controls on esker pattern, and the gl
aciodynamic condition of the ice sheet at the time of esker formation are d
iscussed. A morphologic classification of eskers is proposed. Five types of
eskers are identified and investigated. Type I eskers Likely formed in ext
ensive, synchronous, dendritic R-channel networks under regionally stagnant
ice that terminated in standing water. Type II eskers likely formed in sho
rt, subaqueously terminating R-channels or reentrants close to an ice front
or grounding line that may have actively retreated during esker sedimentat
ion. Type III askers plausibly formed in short R-channels that drained eith
er to interior lakes in, or tunnel channels under, regionally stagnant ice.
Type IV eskers may have formed as time-transgressive segments in short, su
baerially terminating R-channels (or reentrants) that developed close to th
e ice margin as the ice front underwent stagnation-zone retreat or downwast
ed and backwasted regionally (stagnant ice); however, formation in synchron
ous R-channels cannot be discounted on the basis of reported observations.
Type IV eskers may have formed in H-channels that terminated subaerially. T
he spatial distribution of these esker types is discussed. The factors that
determined Laurentide R-channel pattern and operation were likely a comple
x combination of (i) supraglacial meltwater discharge, (ii) the number and
location of sink holes, (iii) the ice surface slope, thickness and velocity
, and (iv) the permeability, topography and rigidity of the bed. These fact
ors cause and respond to changes in ice dynamics and thermal regime over th
e glacial cycle. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.