Assessment of cardiac preload and extravascular lung water by single transpulmonary thermodilution

Citation
Sg. Sakka et al., Assessment of cardiac preload and extravascular lung water by single transpulmonary thermodilution, INTEN CAR M, 26(2), 2000, pp. 180-187
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
ISSN journal
03424642 → ACNP
Volume
26
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
180 - 187
Database
ISI
SICI code
0342-4642(200002)26:2<180:AOCPAE>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Objective: Transpulmonary double-indicator dilution is a useful monitoring technique for measurement of intrathoracic blood volume (ITBV) and extravas cular lung water (EVLW). In this study, we compared a simpler approach usin g single arterial thermodilution derived measurements of ITBV and EVLW with the double-indicator dilution technique. Design: Prospective observational clinical study Setting: Surgical intensive care units of two university hospitals. Patients and methods: Global end-diastolic volume (GEDV) derived from singl e thermodilution was used for calculation of ITBV. Structural regression an alysis of the first two thermo-dye dilution measurements in a derivation po pulation of 57 critically ill patients (38 male, 19 female, 18-79 years. 56 +/- 15 years) revealed ITBV = (1.25 . GEDV) 28.4 (ml). This equation was t hen applied to all first measurements in a validation population of 209 cri tically ill patients (139 male. 70 female, 10-88 years, mean 53 +/- 19 year s), and single-thermodilution ITBV (ITBVST) and EVLW (EVLWST) was calculate d and compared to thermo-dye dilution derived values (ITBVTD EVLWTD). For i nter-individual comparison, absolute values for ITBV and EVLW were normalis ed as indexed by body surface area (ITBVI) and body weight (EVLWI), respect ively. Measurements and results: Linear regression analysis yielded a correlation of ITBVIST = (1.05 . ITBVITD)-58.0 (ml/m(2)), r = 0.97, P < 0.0001. Bias be tween ITBVITD and ITBVIST was 7.6 (ml/m(2)) with a standard deviation of 57 .4 (ml/m(2)). Single-thermodilution EVLWI (EVLWIST) was calculated using IT BVIST and revealed the correlation EVLWIST = (0.83 . EVLWITD)+ 1.6 (ml/kg), r = 0.96, P < 0.0001. Bias between EVLWITD and EVLWIST was -0.2 (ml/kg) wi th a standard deviation of 1.4 (ml/kg). In detail, EVLWIST systematically o verestimated EVLWITD at low-normal values for EVLWI and underestimated EVLW I at higher values (above 12 ml/kg). Conclusion: Determinations of ITBV and EVLW by single thermodilution agreed closely with the corresponding values from the double-indicator technique. Since transpulmonary single thermodilution is simple to apply, less invasi ve and cheaper, all these features make it a promising technique for the be dside. Nevertheless, further validation studies are needed in the future.