Sg. Sakka et al., Assessment of cardiac preload and extravascular lung water by single transpulmonary thermodilution, INTEN CAR M, 26(2), 2000, pp. 180-187
Objective: Transpulmonary double-indicator dilution is a useful monitoring
technique for measurement of intrathoracic blood volume (ITBV) and extravas
cular lung water (EVLW). In this study, we compared a simpler approach usin
g single arterial thermodilution derived measurements of ITBV and EVLW with
the double-indicator dilution technique.
Design: Prospective observational clinical study
Setting: Surgical intensive care units of two university hospitals.
Patients and methods: Global end-diastolic volume (GEDV) derived from singl
e thermodilution was used for calculation of ITBV. Structural regression an
alysis of the first two thermo-dye dilution measurements in a derivation po
pulation of 57 critically ill patients (38 male, 19 female, 18-79 years. 56
+/- 15 years) revealed ITBV = (1.25 . GEDV) 28.4 (ml). This equation was t
hen applied to all first measurements in a validation population of 209 cri
tically ill patients (139 male. 70 female, 10-88 years, mean 53 +/- 19 year
s), and single-thermodilution ITBV (ITBVST) and EVLW (EVLWST) was calculate
d and compared to thermo-dye dilution derived values (ITBVTD EVLWTD). For i
nter-individual comparison, absolute values for ITBV and EVLW were normalis
ed as indexed by body surface area (ITBVI) and body weight (EVLWI), respect
ively.
Measurements and results: Linear regression analysis yielded a correlation
of ITBVIST = (1.05 . ITBVITD)-58.0 (ml/m(2)), r = 0.97, P < 0.0001. Bias be
tween ITBVITD and ITBVIST was 7.6 (ml/m(2)) with a standard deviation of 57
.4 (ml/m(2)). Single-thermodilution EVLWI (EVLWIST) was calculated using IT
BVIST and revealed the correlation EVLWIST = (0.83 . EVLWITD)+ 1.6 (ml/kg),
r = 0.96, P < 0.0001. Bias between EVLWITD and EVLWIST was -0.2 (ml/kg) wi
th a standard deviation of 1.4 (ml/kg). In detail, EVLWIST systematically o
verestimated EVLWITD at low-normal values for EVLWI and underestimated EVLW
I at higher values (above 12 ml/kg).
Conclusion: Determinations of ITBV and EVLW by single thermodilution agreed
closely with the corresponding values from the double-indicator technique.
Since transpulmonary single thermodilution is simple to apply, less invasi
ve and cheaper, all these features make it a promising technique for the be
dside. Nevertheless, further validation studies are needed in the future.