The use of Pt guard electrode in inductively coupled plasma sector field mass spectrometry: advantages and limitations

Citation
Pk. Appelblad et al., The use of Pt guard electrode in inductively coupled plasma sector field mass spectrometry: advantages and limitations, J ANAL ATOM, 15(4), 2000, pp. 359-364
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Spectroscopy /Instrumentation/Analytical Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY
ISSN journal
02679477 → ACNP
Volume
15
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
359 - 364
Database
ISI
SICI code
0267-9477(2000)15:4<359:TUOPGE>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Performance characteristics of inductively coupled plasma sector field mass spectrometry (ICP-SFMS) were studied with a Pt guard electrode (GE) insert ed between the torch and load coil. The importance of the optimisation proc edure and the matrix effects caused by a seawater matrix were assessed for 20 elements. Oxide and doubly charged ion formation was also investigated. Use of the GE allows a significant increase in ion transmission, by a facto r of three to 20, thus resulting in improved instrumental detection limits. The improvement in sensitivity is mass dependent, with the highest gain ob served for lower mass elements. Since, for the majority of analytical appli cations, actual detection limits depend upon blank levels rather on instrum ental sensitivity, the most important factor for the determination of eleme nts at ultra-trace levels is the degree of contamination of reagents and co ntainers used. At the same time, significantly greater oxide formation is o bserved when operating the GE grounded rather than in the floating mode. Fo r example, the BaO+/Ba+ ratio is ten to twelve times higher in the grounded mode. This calls for compromised instrumental parameters and the potential for severe spectral interferences from oxide species, which are often unre solved, even in high-resolution mode. Furthermore, non-spectral interferenc es from the seawater matrix appear to be more pronounced with the grounded GE, yielding a recovery of Ni of 55% compared with 93% in the floating GE m ode. Hence all possible advantages and limitations of the use of the GE sho uld be carefully considered prior to the analysis of real samples.