Pilot plant scale extraction of alginates from Macrocystis pyrifera. 2. Studies on extraction conditions and methods of separating the alkaline-insoluble residue
G. Hernandez-carmona et al., Pilot plant scale extraction of alginates from Macrocystis pyrifera. 2. Studies on extraction conditions and methods of separating the alkaline-insoluble residue, J APPL PHYC, 11(6), 1999, pp. 493-502
The effect of temperature (70, 80, 90 degrees C) and time (1-9 h) during th
e alkaline extraction step on alginate yield and quality were studied. The
alginate yield increased with time and maximum yield was obtained after 3.5
h treatment, ranging from 19.4% at 70 degrees C to 21.9% at 90 degrees C.
The viscosity of the alginate produced was inversely correlated with the te
mperature and time. At 70 degrees C the slope of the curve was almost zero
(753 to 923 mPa s); at 90 degrees C the viscosity loss was 154 mPa s per ho
ur during the first two hours, reducing from 523 to 86 mPa s after 5 h; 80
degrees C yielded values between those for 70 degrees C and 90 degrees C. T
he best conditions for alkaline extraction were using pH 10 at 80 degrees C
for two hours. The curves obtained gave useful information for controlling
the viscosity of the alginate during production. It was found that viscosi
ty of the paste formed during alkaline extraction ('process viscosity') was
the best parameter to determine the reaction rate during extraction. Algin
ate yield increased during filtration time from 17.6% to 23.7% after 55 min
at 70 degrees C. In this step the viscosity of the alginate obtained remai
ned almost constant (522-610 mPa s), indicating no degradation of the produ
cts during filtration. The best dilution to filter the alginate extract was
obtained at 45 mPa s. Diatomaceous earth (Celite) and expanded lava (Perli
te) were tested as filter aids. Expanded lava was the best filter aid, usin
g 1 kg per kilogram of alginate produced. Three methods were studied to sep
arate the alkaline-insoluble residues after extraction: filtration, centrif
ugation, flocculation, and combinations of them. The best system found was
filtration with flocculant in a rotary vacuum filter, with a knife advance
of 0.1 mm every 3.5 seconds and drum rotation of 2 rpm, yielding an average
filtration flow rate of 10.5 L min(-1).