The purpose of this article is to formalize the generalization criterion me
thod for model comparison. The method has the potential to provide powerful
comparisons of complex and nonnested models that may also differ in terms
of numbers of parameters. The generalization criterion differs From the bet
ter known cross-validation criterion in the following critical procedure. A
lthough both employ a calibration stage to estimate parameters, cross-valid
ation employs a replication sample from the same design for the validation
stage, whereas generalization employs a new design for the critical stage.
Two examples of the generalization criterion method are presented that demo
nstrate its usefulness for selecting a model based on sound scientific prin
ciples out of a set that also contains models lacking sound scientific prin
ciples that are either overly complex or oversimplified. The main advantage
of the generalization criterion is its reliance on extrapolations to new c
onditions. After all, accurate a priori predictions to new conditions are t
he hallmark of a good scientific theory. (C) 2000 Academic Press.