P. Fu et al., Dehydrin gene expression and leaf water potential differs between spring and winter cereals during cold acclimation, J PLANT PHY, 156(3), 2000, pp. 394-400
Spring and winter cultivars of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and rye (Secale
cereale L.) were cold acclimated using controlled environment and natural
conditions. With respect to freezing tolerance, winter cereal seedlings cou
ld be distinguished from their spring counterparts by their initiation of a
cclimation at a warmer temperature, increasing in freezing tolerance sooner
, and by achieving greater freezing tolerance at the end of the acclimation
period. The timing and extent of expression of a family of dehydrin genes
correlated with the increase in measured freezing tolerance in both spring
and winter genotypes. The expression of these genes was detected sooner in
the winter types, and dehydrin mRNA accumulated to higher levels in the win
ter cereals. Dehydrin transcripts could be detected throughout the acclimat
ion period in winter cereals, but were only moderately expressed in spring
cereals in response to acclimation. Similar results were obtained using wes
tern blot analysis with a dehydrin carboxy terminal antibody. Crown moistur
e content (CMC), crown osmotic potential (COP) and leaf water potential dec
reased in spring and winter cereals in response to acclimating conditions i
n both controlled environment and field conditions, but were lowest in full
y acclimated winter cereals. However, the onset and rate of decrease in CMC
and COP did not differ between the spring and winter genotypes, suggesting
that neither CMC nor COP were involved in the initial regulation of dehydr
in gene expression. Leaf water potential (LWP) also declined at similar rat
es in the spring and winter cereals in the field between September and Nove
mber. However, a difference in LWP was observed between spring and winter w
heat subjected to a cold shock treatment. The winter genotype LWP decreased
within 10 h of exposure to 2 degrees C, reached significantly lower levels
than prior to the cold shock, but returned to pre cold-shock level after 7
days at 2 degrees C. In contrast, the decline in leaf water potential in s
pring wheat was slower and less pronounced than in winter wheat. These resu
lts correlate well with those observed with dehydrin gene expression and su
ggest a relationship between water potential and cold-induced gene expressi
on.