Multiunit site selection models have long ignored the impact of rime delays
in store openings. To determine the effect of this limitation and to ident
ify a solution, Mie compare three multiunit site selection procedures. The
first is a sequential procedure that selects sires and then opens them one
at a rime. The second is a global approach that selects all future sites in
a single decision process. Third, is a proposed anticipated-delay procedur
e that incorporates opening delays, Jinn planning horizons and discount rat
es in determining appropriate sites for multiunit retail systems. I We furt
her compare the results of these site-selection procedures to similar proce
dures that incorporate leakage to unidentified competitors when seeking loc
ations for new, outlets. We make the comparisons based upon discounted reve
nues by using a two-part, game-like simulation. The simulation estimates re
venue results under the various alternatives while allowing for reactive an
d preemptive competitive store openings. Our results indicate that the anti
cipated-delay procedure incorporating leakage produces a significantly bett
er revenue stream than either the standard sequential or global approach pr
ocedures.