Studies in thoracic aortic graft infections: The development of a porcine model and a comparison of collagen-impregnated Dacron grafts and cryopreserved allografts
Nm. Rowe et al., Studies in thoracic aortic graft infections: The development of a porcine model and a comparison of collagen-impregnated Dacron grafts and cryopreserved allografts, J THOR SURG, 118(5), 1999, pp. 857-864
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Objective: A porcine model of thoracic aortic graft infection was created,
and various anatomic sites and the timing of inoculation of the graft to in
duce infection were investigated. Ultimately, the ability of cryopreserved
allograft to resist infection was compared with that of collagen-impregnate
d Dacron graft. Methods: Yorkshire pigs (n = 16) underwent placement of an
expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch graft in the ascending aorta and the
left atrial appendage (phase I). Eight animals were immediately given a 50
-mL bolus (1 x 10(8) cfu/mL) of Staphylococcus aureus whereas the other 8 r
eceived the infusion 24 hours later. Animals were put to death 8 weeks late
r and the grafts were sterilely explanted and analyzed via microbiologic cu
lture and standard histologic procedures for evidence of infection. The res
ults displayed that the aortic graft and a delay of induced bacteremia of 2
4 hours were more reliable methods of producing infection. During phase II,
13 pigs were randomized to receive either a collagen-impregnated Dacron gr
aft (n = 6) or a cryopreserved allograft (n = 7) in the ascending aortic po
sition only and infusion of S aureus 24 hours after the operation. The expe
riment then proceeded to completion. Results: Phase I results displayed tha
t use of an aortic graft and induced bacteremia 24 hours after the operatio
n was a more reliable and reproducible method of producing infection. In ph
ase II, graft infection was present in 38.5% (5/13) of animals, with only 1
6.7% (1/6) in the collagen-impregnated Dacron graft group and 57.2% (4/7) i
n the cryopreserved allograft group becoming infected. There was no signifi
cant difference between the collagen-impregnate Dacron graft and cryopreser
ved allograft groups in the incidences of thoracic aortic graft infections
(P = .27, Fisher exact test). Conclusions: This novel porcine model of thor
acic aortic graft infection is a reproducible method for the investigation
of thoracic aortic graft infections. The phase I study investigated the tim
ing of the induced bacteremia and the most susceptible position of a graft.
Phase II demonstrated that collagen-impregnated Dacron grafts are equivale
nt, if not superior, to cryopreserved allografts in resisting central vascu
lar graft infections in the ascending aorta.