Two multicenter, randomized studies of the efficacy and safety of cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion in moderate to severe dry eye disease

Citation
K. Sall et al., Two multicenter, randomized studies of the efficacy and safety of cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion in moderate to severe dry eye disease, OPHTHALMOL, 107(4), 2000, pp. 631-639
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Optalmology,"da verificare
Journal title
OPHTHALMOLOGY
ISSN journal
01616420 → ACNP
Volume
107
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
631 - 639
Database
ISI
SICI code
0161-6420(200004)107:4<631:TMRSOT>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of cyclosporin A ([CsA] 0.05% and 0.1% ophthalmic emulsions) to vehicle in patients with moderate to sev ere dry eye disease. Design: Multicenter, randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, 6-month, ve hicle-controlled. Participants: A total of 877 patients with defined moderate to severe dry e ye disease (292 to 293 in each treatment group). Methods: Two identical clinical trials; patients were treated twice daily w ith either CsA, 0.05% or 0.1%, or vehicle. The results of these two trials were combined for analysis. Main Outcome Measures: Efficacy: corneal and interpalpebral dye staining, S chirmer tear test (with and without anesthesia), tear break-up time, Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), facial expression, patient subjective rating scale, symptoms of dry eye, investigator's evaluation of global response t o treatment, treatment success, and daily use of artificial tears. Safety: occurrence of adverse events, best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pre ssure, biomicroscopy, and blood trough CsA concentrations. Results: Treatment with CsA, 0.05% or 0.1%, gave significantly (P less than or equal to 0.05) greater improvements than vehicle in two objective signs of dry eye disease (corneal staining and categorized Schirmer values). CsA 0.05% treatment also gave significantly greater improvements (P < 0.05) in three subjective measures of dry eye disease (blurred vision, need for con comitant artificial tears, and the physician's evaluation of global respons e to treatment). There was no dose-response effect. Both CsA treatments exh ibited an excellent safety profile, and there were no significant topical o r systemic adverse safety findings. Conclusions: The novel ophthalmic formulations CsA 0.05% and 0.1% were safe and effective in the treatment of moderate to severe dry eye disease yield ing improvements in both objective and subjective measures. Topical CsA rep resents a new pharmacologically based treatment for dry eye disease that ma y provide significant patient benefits. (C) 2000 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.