In the face of widespread dissatisfaction with contemporary democratic prac
tice, there has been growing interest in theories of deliberative democracy
. However theorists have often failed to sufficiently address the question
of institutional design. This paper argues that recent experiments with cit
izens' juries should be of interest to deliberative democrats. The practice
of citizens' juries is considered in light of three deliberative democrati
c criteria: inclusivity, deliberation and citizenship. It is argued that ci
tizens' juries offer important insights into how democratic deliberation co
uld be institutionalized in contemporary political decision-making processe
s.