This study reveals that when remembering past decisions, people engage in c
hoice-supportive memory distortion. When asked to make memory attributions
of options' features, participants made source-monitoring errors that suppo
rted their decisions. They tended to attribute, both correctly and incorrec
tly: more positive features to the option they had selected than to its com
petitor. In addition, they sometimes attributed, both correctly and incorre
ctly more negative features to the nonselected option. This pattern of dist
ortion may be beneficial to people's general well-being, reducing regret fo
r options not taken At the same time, it is problematic for memory accuracy
, for accountability and for learning from past experience.