The standard diagnostic tools to identify sexually transmitted infections a
re often expensive and have laboratory and infrastructure requirements that
make them unavailable to family planning and primary health-care clinics i
n developing countries. Therefore, inexpensive, accessible tools that rely
on symptoms, signs, and/or risk factors have been developed to identify and
treat reproductive tract infections without the need for laboratory diagno
stics. Studies were reviewed that used standard diagnostic tests to identif
y gonorrhea and cervical chlamydial infection among women and that provided
adequate information about the usefulness of the tools for screening. Aggr
egation of the studies' results suggest that risk factors, algorithms, and
risk scoring for syndromic management are poor indicators of gonorrhea and
chlamydial infection in samples of both low and high prevalence and, conseq
uently, are not effective mechanisms with which to identify or manage these
conditions. The development and evaluation of other approaches to identify
gonorrhea and chlamydial infections, including inexpensive and simple labo
ratory screening tools, periodic universal treatment, and other alternative
s must be given priority.