This article explores the impact of grantseeking on urban public school tea
chers. It first analyzes how grantseeking, primarily but not exclusively pr
omoted by numerous private and corporate foundations, has introduced urban
teachers to and fostered among them some of the central tenets of the movem
ent to privatize education-to "market" one's teaching as a product and ones
elf as a valuable commodity; to embrace competition and the creation of sel
f-selected communities; and to replace a commitment to a broad-based democr
acy in which the needs of all are met with fulfilling the needs of the "des
erving" few.
The article next discusses the ways in which specific assumption about urba
n teachers have influenced the development of such grant competitions. It a
lso discusses the ways these assumptions promote the ability of a very limi
ted number of high status urban teachers to successfully compete in such co
mpetitions while working to exclude others, particularly teachers of color
and those whose native language is not English.
The article then presents a case history of one grantseeker to illustrate t
he contradictory effects of teachers' participation in privately funded gra
nt programs. It ends bz: raising questions about the purpose and effect of
grantseeking in education and its Potential role in changing the dominant,m
eans of educating children in the United States from a public school system
subject to community urine support and governance-in theory if not in prac
tice-to an increasingly privatized one.