True HIV seroprevalence in Indian blood donors

Citation
N. Choudhury et al., True HIV seroprevalence in Indian blood donors, TRANSFUS M, 10(1), 2000, pp. 1-4
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
TRANSFUSION MEDICINE
ISSN journal
09587578 → ACNP
Volume
10
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1 - 4
Database
ISI
SICI code
0958-7578(200003)10:1<1:THSIIB>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
The National AIDS Control Organization (NACO), the apex body for controllin g AIDS in India, projected that HN seroprevalence would increase from 7/100 0 in 1995 to 21.2/1000 in 1997. A high incidence (8.2%) of HIV was observed in blood donors. This study was carried out to find out the true HIV posit ivity in Indian blood donors. Blood donors from our centre were followed fo r more than 5 years to determine the true HIV seroprevalence and our result was compared with similar studies from India. Voluntary and relative blood donors who visited the SGPGIMS, Lucknow, since 1993 to June 1998 were incl uded. They were screened for HIV 1/2 by ELISA kits (WHO approved). First-ti me HIV-positive samples were preserved frozen for further study (stage-I). They were repeated in duplicate and retested with other kits. If found posi tive, the sample was labelled as ELISA positive (stage-II). ELISA-positive samples were confirmed by Western Blot (WB) at stage-III. A total of 65 288 donors were included and 834 (12.8/1000) were reactive at stage-I. But 1.1 /1000 donors were found to be ELISA positive at stage-II, and 0.28/1000 don ors were positive by WB at stage-III. The 'seropositivity' rate from the NA CO was significantly (P < 0.001) higher than our study. There were five sim ilar Indian studies and seropositivity rate varied from 0.72/1000 (using EL ISA and WE) to 5.5/1000 (using ELISA alone). The 'seropositivity' rate from the NACO was significantly (P < 0.001) higher than all these studies. HIV seroprevalence in the present study is lower (P < 0.001) than other Indian figures. The present and other studies confirmed that the projected HIV ser oprevalence (82/1000) in Indian blood donors was high. The NACO result was based on one-time ELISA screening reports from zonal blood testing centres which also receive samples from paid donors donating in commercial blood ba nks. The HIV prevalence of blood donors (and national prevalence) is to be reassessed.