EFFICACY OF POUR-ON AND INJECTABLE FORMULATIONS OF MOXIDECTIN AND IVERMECTIN IN CATTLE NATURALLY INFECTED WITH PSOROPTES OVIS - PARASITOLOGICAL, CLINICAL AND SEROLOGICAL DATA
Jf. Lonneux et al., EFFICACY OF POUR-ON AND INJECTABLE FORMULATIONS OF MOXIDECTIN AND IVERMECTIN IN CATTLE NATURALLY INFECTED WITH PSOROPTES OVIS - PARASITOLOGICAL, CLINICAL AND SEROLOGICAL DATA, Veterinary parasitology, 69(3-4), 1997, pp. 319-330
On the basis of Psoroptes ovis counts performed on day -7, 32 animals
were randomly allocated to a control group of five animals or to four
groups comprising six or seven animals which were treated, respectivel
y, with pour-on ivermectin (IPO), injectable ivermectin (II), pour-on
moxidectin (MPO) and injectable moxidectin (IM). Living mites were cou
nted in skin scrapings on days 0, 7, 14, 28, 42 and 56 post-treatment
(PT). Lesions were recorded on a standardized map on days 0 and 56 PT.
Antibody kinetics were studied using ELISA on serially diluted sera.
The antibody titres were expressed as the dilution giving the positive
/negative cut-off. Until their treatment on day 28, the control animal
s remained parasitologically positive and their antibody titres increa
sed. In treated groups, all living mite counts were negative on days 2
8 and 42 PT but some animals were still infected on days 7 and 14 PT.
On day 56, living P. ovis were found in one animal of the IPO group. A
n equation of regression describing the antibody decrease was calculat
ed with each individual data set. In most of the treated animals, the
coefficient of determination R-2, which describes the closeness of fit
to the linear model, was above 0.9. The linear model could not be app
lied (low R-2) to the antibody kinetics of four animals: the day 56 po
sitive animal and its two neighbours in the IPO group and one animal f
rom the MPO group. In the treated groups, the differences between the
numbers of infected animals, the mean daily weight gains or the mean a
ntibody titres were not statistically significant. Mean daily weight g
ains of the treated groups were higher than in control animals. (C) 19
97 Elsevier Science B.V.