Ri. Fogel et al., Long-term follow-up of patients requiring intravenous amiodarone to suppress hemodynamically destabilizing ventricular arrhythmias, AM HEART J, 139(4), 2000, pp. 690-695
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Background intravenous amiodarone is effective for the acute suppression of
recurrent hemodynamically destabilizing ventricular arrhythmias. There are
no follow-up data on patients undergoing long term therapy with intravenou
s amiodarone. The objective of this investigation was to evaluate long-term
outcome.
Methods and Results We reviewed the clinical courses of 245 patients given
intravenous amiodarone for sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Of the 1
07 survivors (84% men; mean age 64 years) released from the hospital taking
oral amiodarone, 41 were discharged with an empiric prescription for oral
amiodarone. For 64 patients a decision regarding further therapy was based
on results of an electrophysiologic study. Two patients were treated empiri
cally with oral amiodarone and on implantable cardioverter defibrillator. C
linical variables and survival curves were the same for the empirically tre
ated group and the group whose treatment was based on electrophysiologic fi
ndings (P = .89). Survival at 6, 12, and 18 months was 88%, 81% and 71% res
pectively, for empirically treated patients, and 83%, 80% and 73%, respecti
vely, For patients whose therapy was directed with on electrophysiologic st
udy. Of the 64 patients who underwent electrophysiologic studies, 33 receiv
ed an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. The Koplan-Meier survival cur
ves for patients with and patients without on implantable cardioverter defi
brillator were similar (P = .46).
Conclusions Patients for whom recurrent ventricular tachycardia and fibrill
ation are suppressed with intravenous amiodarone and who are discharged rec
eiving oral amiodarone have an 80% 1-year survival rate. Although nor rando
mized, our data suggested that among such patients, electrophysiologic test
ing, implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator, or both may not be neces
sary. Ascertaining the best management strategy for these patients will req
uire a prospective randomized trial.