PURPOSE: To demonstrate a hold-up of part of the fluorescein bolus in the a
rm as a result of arm position.
METHOD: Case report. We obtained a fluorescein angiogram with a calibrated
confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope in a 20-year-old healthy subject. Du
ring and after injection, the upper arm was held in approximately 60 degree
s abduction, 65 degrees exorotation, and slight anteflexion. In the late ve
nous phase, the subject moved the upper arm on the injected side to a more
neutral, downward position,
RESULTS: We measured a distinct rise in fluorescence level about 10 seconds
after movement of the arm, The most likely explanation is relief of a part
ial obstruction of the venous drainage, which had been caused by the positi
on of the upper arm described above.
CONCLUSION: Impaired venous drainage of the injected arm caused by exorotat
ion and abduction of the upper arm is a potentially common cause of delayed
dye arrival or unexpectedly reduced contrast level during fluorescein angi
ography, Therefore, arm position needs attention in fluorescein angiography
.(Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129: 551-552, (C) 2000 by Elsevier Science Inc. All
rights reserved).