Aspects of the environment, including the social environment, can contribut
e to intrapopulation variation in mating preferences. One example of the ef
fect of social environment on mate preferences is mate choice copying; howe
ver, other types of socially influenced (nonindependent) choice might exist
. We develop a list of such alternatives based on possible physiological or
psychological mechanisms, evaluate the evidence distinguishing one from an
other and clarify some controversial aspects of mate choice copying. This f
ramework reveals many ways in which one female's mate choice can influence
that of another, and suggests a broader array of hypotheses about the selec
tive forces acting on such mechanisms. Because nonindependent choice can oc
cur in a variety of ways, it could be more important for understanding patt
erns of mate choice than current theory suggests. (C) 2000 The Association
for the Study of Animal Behaviour.