Objectives: To study the influence of test length in automated perimetry fo
llow-up of glaucomatous eyes and, particularly, to determine if it is possi
ble to usefully interpret test results obtained using a testing algorithm s
horter than that used for baseline testing.
Methods: Automated perimetry findings were retrospectively evaluated in 31
patients with glaucoma for whom multiple Humphrey 30-2 tests were available
on the Full Threshold strategy and the SITA Standard strategy.
Results: Variability around the mean deviation regression lines was smaller
with SITA than with the Full Threshold strategy. Mean deviation values wit
h SITA averaged about 1 dB less severe. Although localized scotomas measure
d in decibels were deeper on the Full Threshold strategy, number of signifi
cantly depressed points on total deviation and pattern deviation probabilit
y plot analyses did not differ significantly between the 2 strategies.
Conclusions: The SITA strategy showed test-retest consistency that was at l
east as good as that of the Full Threshold strategy. The 2 strategies produ
ced similar results when analyzed relative to their respective normal signi
ficance limits. Generally, it is appropriate to establish a new baseline wh
en converting from one perimetric algorithm to another. When necessary, how
ever, results may be usefully compared if such comparisons are based on tot
al and pattern deviation probability maps rather than on decibel values.