The potential role of an adult mentor in influencing high-risk behaviors in adolescents

Background: While mentorship programs, which connect adolescents with adult s to whom they can turn to for help and advice, are proliferating in an att empt to prevent high-risk behaviors in teenagers, there are few data to sho w that mentorship actually makes a difference. Objective: To determine if there is an association between having an adult mentor and high-risk behaviors in adolescents. Hypothesis: Adolescents who have an adult mentor would be less likely to en gage in high-risk behaviors than those without an adult mentor. Design: Cross-sectional study. A self-administered, anonymous questionnaire was developed to assess demographics, involvement in risk behaviors, and t he prevalence of a mentor in the life of a young person. Participants: A convenience sample of 294 adolescents, seen consecutively ( 93% of those approached), receiving outpatient medical care. Participants w ere pre dominantly female (68%), of mixed race/ethnicity, aged between 12 a nd 23 years (mean +/- SD age, 16.9 +/- 2.4), and from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds. Setting: An adolescent health service in a suburban community-based teachin g hospital. Main Outcome Measures: Adolescent smoking, alcohol and drug use, sexual pra ctices, and weapon carrying. Results: Adolescents with mentors were significantly less likely to partici pate in 4 of the 5 measured risk behaviors: ever carrying a weapon (odds ra tio, 0.41; P less than or equal to.01), illicit drug use in the past 30 day s (odds ratio, 0.44; P less than or equal to.01), smoking more than 5 cigar ettes per day (odds ratio, 0.54; P less than or equal to.05), and sex with more than 1 partner in the past 6 months (odds ratio, 0.56; P less than or equal to.05): No significant difference was found with alcohol use (greater than or equal to 3 drinks in the past 30 days). Conclusion: A strong positive relationship was found between adolescents ha ving an adult mentor and decreased participation in 4 of the 5 risk behavio rs evaluated.