Pediatric resident and faculty knowledge of the Denver II

Citation
Ms. Barratt et Va. Moyer, Pediatric resident and faculty knowledge of the Denver II, ARCH PED AD, 154(4), 2000, pp. 411-413
Citations number
7
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics,"Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE
ISSN journal
10724710 → ACNP
Volume
154
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
411 - 413
Database
ISI
SICI code
1072-4710(200004)154:4<411:PRAFKO>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Objective: To assess knowledge of the Denver II, the revised developmental screening tool recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics, in reside nts and faculty, and to evaluate a teaching intervention for incoming postg raduate year 1 (PGY-1) trainees. Design: A cross-sectional rest of knowledge for all subjects and pretesting and posttesting of the incoming PGY-1 trainees. Setting: University of Texas-Houston Medical School Department of Pediatric s. Participants. Faculty (n = 9) and residents (n = 78), including an interven tion group (n = 45), of incoming PGY-1 trainees over 2 years. Interventions: Postgraduate year 1 trainees in both 1994 through 1995 and 1 995 through 1996 viewed the Denver IT training videotape on entry into a co ntinuity clinic. Trainees were encouraged to perform Denver II evaluations on at least 1 appropriate patient at each pediatric clinic session and had access to Denver II support materials. Main Outcome Measures: Scores on the Denver II Proficiency Written Test, se lf-reported measures of comfort, and number of Denver II evaluations perfor med. Results: The mean (SD) test scores for incoming, preintervention PGY-1. tra inees (n = 45) (41.3 [9.6]) did not differ from scores for outgoing PGY-1 t rainees (n = 13) (38.5 [10.4]) who had not received the intervention. Posti ntervention PGY-1 test results were significantly improved (59.4 [10.6]) (P <.001). Test scores for upper-level residents who had participated in the d evelopmental pediatrics rotation (n = 14) were better (55.3 [9.3]), but all scored below passing. Residents who had not yet participated in the develo pmental pediatrics rotation (n = 19) and members of the general pediatric f aculty (n = 9) had scores similar to those of PGY-1 trainees (40.9 [13.4] a nd 39.0 [15.1], respectively). Conclusions: Residents had a greater knowledge of the Denver II after compl eting a developmental pediatrics rotation. Our intervention produced signif icant improvement in PGY-1 trainees' knowledge, raising it to levels simila r to those of upper-level residents exposed to developmental pediatrics. Fa culty were not expert in using the Denver II.