Tuc. Jarbe et al., Delta(9)-THC training dose as a determinant for (R)-methanandamide generalization in rats: a systematic replication, BEHAV PHARM, 11(1), 2000, pp. 81-86
Jarbe et al. (1998a) trained rats to discriminate between (-)-Delta(9)-tetr
ahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC) and vehicle, using different training doses
in order to create assays with different efficacy demands, to examine whet
her (R)-methanandamide, an analog of the endogenous ligand anandamide, had
lower efficacy than Delta(9)-THC. Rats were initially trained with 3 mg/kg
Delta(9)-THC, then tested with (R)-methanandamide and Delta(9)-THC. Thereaf
ter, the rats were split into two groups and retrained with either 1.8 or 5
.6 mg/kg Delta(9)-THC, followed by additional tests with the two agonists.
The current study systematically replicated this study in two groups of rat
s, trained from the outset to discriminate between vehicle and either 1.8 o
r 5.6 mg/kg Delta(9)-THC, respectively. Two-lever operant drug discriminati
on procedures were used. The outcomes in the two studies were similar. In t
ests with (R)-methanandamide, full substitution occurred in the low-dose De
lta(9)-THC training group, whereas substitution was partial in the high-dos
e Delta(9)-THC training group. (R)-Methanandamide in higher doses exerted m
arked suppression of lever pressing. In tests with Delta(9)-THC, full subst
itution occurred in both Delta(9)-THC-trained groups, and rates of respondi
ng were comparable to those observed during regular drug training sessions.
In conclusion, both sets of data indicate that cannabinoid agonists either
can have varying degrees of efficacy at a receptor site, or may produce th
eir behavioral actions through multiple mechanisms, or both. Prevailing tra
ining-dose condition rather than prior training-dose history is the major d
eterminant for the substitution pattern. (C) 2000 Lippincott Williams and W
ilkins.