Phosphorus release from coated monoammonium phosphate: Effect of coating thickness, temperature, elution medium, soil moisture and placement method

Citation
Mc. Zhang et al., Phosphorus release from coated monoammonium phosphate: Effect of coating thickness, temperature, elution medium, soil moisture and placement method, CAN J SOIL, 80(1), 2000, pp. 127-134
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE
ISSN journal
00084271 → ACNP
Volume
80
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
127 - 134
Database
ISI
SICI code
0008-4271(200002)80:1<127:PRFCMP>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Coating fertilizer granules with a polymer slows the release of nutrients o ver a long period of time, so that the fertilizer uptake by plants may be e nhanced. Two laboratory experiments were conducted to determine the effects of coating thickness, temperature, soil moisture, and placement method on the release rate of P from coated monoammonium phosphate (MAP) in soil; to compare the release rate of P from coated MAP in soil and in water; and to evaluate different kinetic equations for simulating the release of P from c oated MAP. In exp. 1, release of P from 10 pre-weighed granules of a non-co ated MAP and three polymer-coated MAP fertilizers (Coated I, 4%; Coated II, 4.5%; and Coated III, 5%) was determined in water at 10 and 23 degrees C. In exp. 2, release of P from the four MAP fertilizers in soil was determine d at two temperatures (10 and 23 degrees C), two moisture levels (90 and 60 % field capacity) and two placement methods (incorporation and banding). Fo ur kinetic equations, i.e., simple Elovich, Parabolic diffusion, Power func tion, and First order kinetics, were evaluated to simulate the release of P from coated MAP. Activation energy of P release was calculated using the P release versus In time plots of the simple Elovich equation. The release r ate of P from coated MAP was strongly affected by coating thickness and tem perature but was not affected by method of P placement and soil water conte nt. The release of P from coated MAP was slower in soil than in water, and it decreased markedly with increasing thickness of polymer coating on MAP, whereas it increased with increasing temperature. The simple Elovich equati on best described the release of P from coated MAP in both water and soil. The activation energy was not affected by elution medium and coating thickn ess but it was lower at the higher temperature. In conclusion, the test of P release rate from coated MAP in water may not represent the true release rate of P from coated MAP in soil, as it is influenced by elution medium, t emperature and coating thickness. The simple Elovich equation best describe d the P release kinetics from coated MAP in soil and in water.