Overexpressed A(1) adenosine receptors reduce activation of acetylcholine-sensitive K+ current by native muscarinic M-2 receptors in rat atrial myocytes
Mc. Wellner-kienitz et al., Overexpressed A(1) adenosine receptors reduce activation of acetylcholine-sensitive K+ current by native muscarinic M-2 receptors in rat atrial myocytes, CIRCUL RES, 86(6), 2000, pp. 643-648
In adult rat atrial myocytes, muscarinic acetylcholine (ACh)-sensitive K+ c
urrent activated by a saturating concentration of adenosine (I-K(ACh),I-(Ad
o)) via A(1) receptors (A(1)Rs) amounts to only 30% of the current activate
d by a saturating concentration of ACh (I-K(ACh),I-(ACh)) via muscarinic M-
2 receptors, The half-time of activation of I-K(ACh),I-(Ado) on a rapid exp
osure to agonist was approximate to 4-fold longer than that of I-K(ACh),I-(
ACh). Furthermore, I-K(ACh),I-(Ado) never showed fast desensitization. To s
tudy the importance of receptor density for A(1)R-I-K(ACh),I-(Ado) signalin
g, adult atrial myocytes in vitro were transfected with cDNA encoding for r
at brain A(1)R and enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) as a reporter.
Whole-cell current was measured on days 3 and 3 after transfection. Time-m
atched cells transfected with only the EGFP vector served as controls. In a
pproximate to 30% of EGFP-positive cells (group I), the density of I-K(ACh)
,I-(Ado) was increased by 72%, and its half-time of activation was reduced.
Density and kinetic properties of I-K(ACh),I-(ACh) were not affected in th
is fraction. In approximate to 70% of transfection-positive myocytes (group
II), the density of I-K(ACh),I-(ACh) was significantly reduced, its activa
tion was slowed, and the fast desensitizing component was lost. Adenosine-i
nduced currents were larger in group II than in group I, their activation r
ate was further increased, and a fast desensitizing component developed. Th
ese data indicate that in native myocytes the amplitude and activation kine
tics of I-K(ACh),I-(Ado) are limited by the expression of A(1)R. Overexpres
sion of A(1)R negatively interferes with signal transduction via the muscar
inic M-2 receptor-linked pathway, which might reflect a competition of rece
ptors with a common pool of G proteins. Negative interference of an overexp
ressed receptor with physiological regulation of a target protein by a diff
erent receptor should be considered in attempts to use receptor overexpress
ion for gene therapy.