Parents' assistance of their children's scientific reasoning

Citation
Me. Gleason et L. Schauble, Parents' assistance of their children's scientific reasoning, COGN INSTR, 17(4), 1999, pp. 343-378
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION
ISSN journal
07370008 → ACNP
Volume
17
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
343 - 378
Database
ISI
SICI code
0737-0008(1999)17:4<343:PAOTCS>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
Research suggests that parents are effective at scaffolding their children' s learning to help them become self-regulated problem solvers. Yet little i s known about parents' effectiveness at assisting their children with probl ems that parents find unfamiliar and, thus, do not have at hand either the solution or strategies that a novice child could profitably implement. In t his study, 20 dyads of parents and their preadolescent children spent 45 mi n solving a scientific reasoning problem that entailed generating and inter preting a series of experimental trials to understand the causal structure of a moderately complex system. As the dyads worked, researchers tracked th eir experimentation strategies, patterns of interaction, and changes in the ir domain-specific beliefs about the system. In comparison to solo particip ants observed in previous research, the dyads performed well on strategies for generating and interpreting evidence. However, parents assumed most of the difficult conceptual tasks, including recording data and making inferen ces, and delegated the logistical roles-the actual manual operation of the equipment-to the children. Parents did not cede the conceptual roles to chi ldren as the session progressed. On the positive side, parents shared contr ol of the problem solving and engaged in collaborative discussions with the ir children. Parents also provided valuable assistance of many kinds, usual ly during the evidence-generation phase of the trials. They missed key oppo rtunities for helping children interpret evidence, and as a result, childre n failed to achieve the gains in understanding that the parents did. The be liefs of parents and children did not come into closer alignment over the c ourse of the study. We conclude, especially as children reach school age, t hat parents who wish to assist their children's learning may increasingly n eed to understand how their children think-not just in general, but about c entral kinds of problems and content domains.