This article analyzes why it is that China, an authoritarian political syst
em, has managed to generate more popular support for the reform process tha
n India a democracy. The authors argue that when local politicians and bure
aucrats are more supportive of the reform process, there is likely to be gr
eater popular support for economic reform. Local political elite may be mor
e supportive of reform in an authoritarian than in a democratic system beca
use the level of local elite support for the reform process is influenced b
y the incentives faced by local elite. In China, institutional reform chang
ed the incentives faced by local elite, whereas in India, reforms have not
been accompanied by institutional changes that would encourage local elite
to support reform to the same extent as in China. The argument is based on
local elite and mass surveys conducted in China and India in 1990 and 1996,
respectively. A legit model, controlling for a variety of alternative expl
anations, provides evidence that local elite support is critical for explai
ning whether reforms are popular.