Em. Coutinho et al., Gossypol blood levels and inhibition of spermatogenesis in men taking gossypol as a contraceptive - A multicenter, international, dose-finding study, CONTRACEPT, 61(1), 2000, pp. 61-67
The safety and efficacy of gossypol continues to be controversial. The aim
of this study was to evaluate gossypol as a contraceptive pill for men at d
oses lower than those previously prescribed and in men from various ethnic
origin. A total of 151 men from Brazil, Nigeria, Kenya, and China were divi
ded into two groups. Both groups received 15 mg gossypol/day for 12 or 16 w
eeks to leach spermatogenesis suppression. Subjects were then randomized to
either 7.5 or 10 mg/day for 40 weeks. In addition, 51 men were enrolled as
a control group. In all, 81 subjects attained spermatogenesis suppression.
Only one man discontinued treatment because of tiredness. Potassium levels
fluctuated within the normal range. FSH increased consistently. Testicular
volume decreased, but after discontinuation, values returned to levels not
statistically different from admission. Of 19 subjects on the 7.5 mg/day d
ose group, 12 recovered sperm counts >20 million/mL within 12 months of dis
continuing gossypol. In the 10 mg/day group, sperm counts recovered in only
10 of 24 subjects. Eight of the 43 patients remained azoospermic 1 year af
ter stopping gossypol. All men diagnosed with varicocele failed to reverse
spermatogenesis suppression. Gossypol blood levels indicated that sperm sup
pression occurs independently of concentration, whereas spermatogenesis rec
overy appears to be concentration-dependent. Gossypol may become a medical
alternative to surgical vasectomy when the delay in onset of infertility is
acceptable. When taken for 1 year, gossypol causes no reduction in sexual
desire or frequency of intercourse. The possibility of reversal, occurring
in 51% of the men on this regimen within 1 year after stopping gossypol, is
an advantage of this compound as compared with surgical sterilization in m
any parts of the world. CONTRACEPTION 2000;61:61-67 (C) 2000 Elsevier Scien
ce Inc. All rights reserved.