Multiple sclerosis (MS) is considered an autoimmune disease associated with
immune activity directed against central nervous system antigens. Based on
this concept, immunosuppression and immunomodualtion have been the mainsta
ys of therapeutic strategies in MS. During the last decade new therapies ha
ve been shown to significantly improve MS disease course. The effective the
rapies have led to a better understanding of MS pathogenesis and further de
velopment of even more efficient therapeutic interventions.
Recombinant interferon (IFN)beta represents the first breakthrough in MS th
erapy. Three large placebo-controlled, double-blind studies and several sma
ller studies have demonstrated the efficacy of different forms of IFN beta
administrated by either subcutaneous or intramuscular routes and at differe
nt doses in patients with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RR
-MS). The three IFN beta drugs are IFN beta-1b and two IFN beta-1a preparat
ions (Avonex(R) and Rebif(R)). Although each clinical trial had unique feat
ures and differences that make direct comparisons difficult, the aggregate
results demonstrate a clear benefit of IFN beta for decreasing relapses and
probability of sustained clinical disability progression in patients with
RR-MS. All forms of IFN beta therapy had beneficial effects on the disease
process measured by brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). IFN beta-1a (Av
onex(R)) also showed benefit in slowing or preventing the development of MS
related brain atrophy measured by MRI after 2 years of therapy.
Glatiramer acetate, the acetate salt of a mixture synthetic polypeptides th
ought to mimic the myelin basic protein showed a significant positive resul
ts in reducing the relapse rate in patients with RR-MS. Follow up of these
patients for approximately 3 years continued to show a beneficial effect on
disease relapse rate. Recent MRI data supported the beneficial clinical re
sults seen with glatiramer acetate in patients with RR-MS.
Recent studies using intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) suggest that IVIG c
ould be effective to some degree in patients with RR-MS. However, there is
not enough evidence that IVIG is equivalent to IFN beta or glatiramer aceta
te in the treatment of patients with RR-MS.
There have also been recent therapeutical advances in secondary progressive
MS (SP-MS). A recent large phase III, placebo-controlled study with IFN be
ta-1b in patients with SP-MS convincingly documented that IFN beta-1b slowe
d progression of the disease independent of the degree of the clinical disa
bility at the time of treatment initiation and independent of presence of s
uperimposed relapses.
Mitoxantrone, an anthracenedione synthetic agent, was also shown to be effe
ctive as treatment for active SP-MS. It is well tolerated but the duration
of treatment is limited by cumulative cardiotoxicity.
There is a growing consensus that disease-modifying therapies should be ini
tiated early in the course of the disease before irreversible clinical disa
bility has developed. Different therapies should be considered and tailored
based on patient condition. Combination therapies could be considered as a
therapeutic option for patients that failed therapies with IFN beta and/or
glatiramer acetate. Currently, there are new ongoing studies testing safet
y and/or efficacy of different combination regimens (i.e. azathioprine with
IFN beta, IFN beta with glatiramer acetate, or pulses of intravenous cyclo
phosphamide with IFN beta).
Determining the effect of different therapies on the course of the disease
within large clinical studies appears easier than determining individual re
sponsiveness. Therefore. standardised methods for evaluating individual pat
ients receiving disease-modifying therapies and development of effective th
erapeutic algorithms are needed.