Meropenem is a carbapenem antibacterial agent that has antimicrobial activi
ty against Gram-negative, Gram-positive and anaerobic micro-organisms. rn v
itro studies involving isolates from patients in intensive care units (ICUs
) indicate that meropenem is more active against most Gram-negative pathoge
ns than other comparators (including imipenem), although, compared with imi
penem, meropenem is less active against most Gram-positive organisms. Resis
tance to meropenem is uncommon in most bacteria.
Treatment with meropenem as initial empirical monotherapy was effective in
a range of serious infections in adult and paediatric ICU patients. Meropen
em monotherapy was as effective as imipenem/cilastatin in 4 comparative tri
als in terms of satisfactory clinical and bacteriological responses.
Meropenem monotherapy was significantly more effective than ceftazidime-bas
ed combination treatments in 2 trials in patients with nosocomial lower res
piratory tract infections (LRTIs) in terms of both clinical and bacteriolog
ical responses. Meropenem was also more active than ceftazidime-based treat
ments against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms, However, 2 st
udies in patients with a range of serious infections found no significant d
ifferences between meropenem and cephalosporin-based treatments in terms of
clinical or bacteriological response. Meropenem was also as effective as c
ephalosporin-based treatments in comparative trials in children with seriou
s infections.
Meropenem is well tolerated as either a bolus or an infusion, and clinical
trials have shown similar incidences of adverse events to those observed wi
th cephalosporin-based treatments. It is well tolerated by the CNS, with se
izures reported infrequently, and can therefore be used at high doses and i
n patients with meningitis. The incidence of drug-related nausea and vomiti
ng is low and, in contrast to imipenem/cilastatin, does not increase with d
ose or speed of administration.
Conclusions: Meropenem is a well tolerated broad spectrum antibacterial age
nt that, when used as initial empirical monotherapy, is as effective as imi
penem/cilastatin in the treatment of a range of serious infections (includi
ng nosocomial) in adults and children in ICUs. Compared with cephalosporin-
based combination treatments, meropenem monotherapy may be more effective i
n the treatment of nosocomial LRTIs and can be used as monotherapy. Meropen
em has an important role in the empirical treatment of serious infections i
n adults and children in ICUs.