In Costanza et al.'s famous Nature paper [Costanza, R., d'Arge, R, de Groot
, R, Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., et al. The value of the world's ec
osystem services and natural capital. Nature 15 (387), 253-260.] a value fo
r the world's ecosystem services is posited as a point of departure for fur
ther discussion. These calculations were re-estimated and qualitatively ass
essed in application to the Pantanal sub-region Nhecolandia. The original s
tudy was re-estimated to evaluate the sensitivity of the original study to
more detailed and accurate data and to better understand the potential for
the people of the Pantanal to benefit from environmental stewardship. Refoc
using the analysis to the regional watershed level using locally derived da
ta provided an opportunity to explore appropriate local policy alternatives
and recognize regional biophysical heterogeneity which is largely impracti
cal at the global, hemispheric or, perhaps, national scale. A value of more
than US$15.5 billion, or US$5 million per resident was derived; an annual
per hectare value of approximately 1/2 of Costanza et al.'s calculations. M
ore biophysically diverse, but largely drier, regional conditions indicated
by our data explain this discrepancy. Water supply and disturbance regulat
ion contribute close to 2/3 of the total calculated value. Waste treatment,
cultural value, and water regulation each contribute substantially (6-9%)
to the total. Nutrient cycling, recreation, and habitat values play more mi
nor roles (1.5-3%) in the total valuation. The concepts of imperfect substi
tutes and comparative advantage are applied within the broad category of na
tural capital in order to evaluate the potential of alternative economic de
velopment strategies for the region. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rig
hts reserved.