Enhancing venous outflow in the lower limb with intermittent pneumatic compression. A comparative haemodynamic analysis on the effect of foot vs. calf vs. foot and calf compression

Citation
Kt. Delis et al., Enhancing venous outflow in the lower limb with intermittent pneumatic compression. A comparative haemodynamic analysis on the effect of foot vs. calf vs. foot and calf compression, EUR J VAS E, 19(3), 2000, pp. 250-260
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY
ISSN journal
10785884 → ACNP
Volume
19
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
250 - 260
Database
ISI
SICI code
1078-5884(200003)19:3<250:EVOITL>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Objectives: intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC), an established method of deep-vein thrombosis prophylaxis, is also an effective means of leg inf low enhancement, improving the walking capacity and ankle pressure of claud icants, long-term. This study, using duplex ultrasonography, compares the h aemodynamic effect of IPC of the (a) foot (at 120 mmHg [IPCfoot/120 mmHg], and 180 mmHg [IPCfoot/180 mm Hg]), (b) calf (IPCcalf, 120 mmHg) and (c) bot h simultaneously (IPCfoot+calf, 120 mmHg), on the venous outflow of 20 legs of normals and 25 legs of claudicants. Results: the peak and mean velocities, volume flow and pulsatility index in the superficial femoral and popliteal veins of both groups increased signi ficantly with all IPC modes (p<0.001). IPCfoot+calf produced the highest en hancement followed by IPCcalf (p<0.01), which was more effective (p<0.001) than either IPCfoot/180 mmHg or IPCfoot/120 mmHg, The venous volume expelle d with IPCcalf and IPCfoot+calf was 2-2.5 and 3-3.5 times that with IPCfoot /180 mmHg respectively. Velocity enhancement with IPC was similar between g roups and the superficial femoral and popliteal veins, IPCfoot/180 mmHg pro duced higher (p<0.01) flow velocities than IPCfoot/120 mmHg in both groups and veins examined; however, differences were limited. Conclusions: all IPC modes proved effective, IPCfoot+calf generating the hi ghest venous outflow, enhancement. Higher venous volumes expelled with IPCf oot+calf explain its reported superiority on leg inflow, over the other mod es. Increase of applied pressure from 120 to 180 mmHg with IPCfoot, offered only a small outflow improvement. Venous haemodynamics at rest and with IP C in claudicants do not differ significantly from those in healthy subjects .