Enhancing venous outflow in the lower limb with intermittent pneumatic compression. A comparative haemodynamic analysis on the effect of foot vs. calf vs. foot and calf compression
Kt. Delis et al., Enhancing venous outflow in the lower limb with intermittent pneumatic compression. A comparative haemodynamic analysis on the effect of foot vs. calf vs. foot and calf compression, EUR J VAS E, 19(3), 2000, pp. 250-260
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY
Objectives: intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC), an established method
of deep-vein thrombosis prophylaxis, is also an effective means of leg inf
low enhancement, improving the walking capacity and ankle pressure of claud
icants, long-term. This study, using duplex ultrasonography, compares the h
aemodynamic effect of IPC of the (a) foot (at 120 mmHg [IPCfoot/120 mmHg],
and 180 mmHg [IPCfoot/180 mm Hg]), (b) calf (IPCcalf, 120 mmHg) and (c) bot
h simultaneously (IPCfoot+calf, 120 mmHg), on the venous outflow of 20 legs
of normals and 25 legs of claudicants.
Results: the peak and mean velocities, volume flow and pulsatility index in
the superficial femoral and popliteal veins of both groups increased signi
ficantly with all IPC modes (p<0.001). IPCfoot+calf produced the highest en
hancement followed by IPCcalf (p<0.01), which was more effective (p<0.001)
than either IPCfoot/180 mmHg or IPCfoot/120 mmHg, The venous volume expelle
d with IPCcalf and IPCfoot+calf was 2-2.5 and 3-3.5 times that with IPCfoot
/180 mmHg respectively. Velocity enhancement with IPC was similar between g
roups and the superficial femoral and popliteal veins, IPCfoot/180 mmHg pro
duced higher (p<0.01) flow velocities than IPCfoot/120 mmHg in both groups
and veins examined; however, differences were limited.
Conclusions: all IPC modes proved effective, IPCfoot+calf generating the hi
ghest venous outflow, enhancement. Higher venous volumes expelled with IPCf
oot+calf explain its reported superiority on leg inflow, over the other mod
es. Increase of applied pressure from 120 to 180 mmHg with IPCfoot, offered
only a small outflow improvement. Venous haemodynamics at rest and with IP
C in claudicants do not differ significantly from those in healthy subjects
.