A. Tavaniotou et al., Comparison between different routes of progesterone administration as luteal phase support in infertility treatments, HUM REP UPD, 6(2), 2000, pp. 139-148
Different routes of natural progesterone supplementation have been tried as
luteal phase support in infertility treatments, Orally administered proges
terone is rapidly metabolized in the gastrointestinal tract and its use has
proved to be inferior to i.m. and vaginal routes. Progesterone i.m. achiev
es serum progesterone values that are within the range of luteal phase and
results in sufficient secretory transformation of the endometrium and satis
factory pregnancy rates. The comparison between i.m. and vaginal progestero
ne has led to controversial results as regards the superiority of one or th
e other in inducing secretory endometrial transformation. However, there is
increasing evidence in the literature to favour the use of vaginal progest
erone. Vaginally administered progesterone achieves adequate endometrial se
cretory transformation but its pharmacokinetic properties are greatly depen
dent on the formulation used. After vaginal progesterone application, discr
epancies have been detected between serum progesterone values and histologi
cal endometrial features. Vaginally administered progesterone results in ad
equate secretory endometrial transformation, despite serum progesterone val
ues lower than those observed after i.m. administration, even if they are l
ower than those observed during the luteal phase of the natural cycle. This
discrepancy is indicative of the first uterine pass effect and therefore o
f a better bioavailability of progesterone in the uterus, with minimal syst
ematic undesirable effects.