A previous survey found that residents near a hazardous waste incinerator r
eported more respiratory symptoms than residents of a nearby community. To
explore the possibility that these findings might have been due to the use
of a rural control site, far removed from urban pollution, we expanded the
analysis to include reports of respiratory symptoms from residents of six a
dditional communities. Residents of each of four study communities were exp
osed to the plumes of biomedical, municipal or hazardous waste combustors.
For each study community, a comparison community was surveyed that was dist
ant from major point sources of air pollution. Over 4200 respondents were q
ueried by telephone about respiratory symptoms, smoking and other risk fact
ors such as chemical exposures in the workplace and home, and provided a su
bjective assessment of air quality in their neighborhoods. Differences in s
ymptom prevalence between each study community and its respective control c
ommunity, as well as a combined control group, were explored, controlling f
or factors other than community exposure that may affect respiratory health
. Results indicate a higher prevalence of all self-reported respiratory sym
ptoms in one community near a hazardous waste incinerator compared with its
control community. While this relationship persisted after controlling for
perceived air quality and when compared with a combined control group, onl
y respiratory symptoms of long duration remained significant. These results
suggest that further examination of the respiratory health of residents li
ving near this waste combustor source is warranted.