The qualities that are important for helicopter impulsive noise wind-tunnel
testing are evaluated by comparing aerodynamic and acoustic data gathered
on a single-scaled model main rotor that was tested in two open-jet wind an
echoic willd tunnels of markedly different size: the CEPRA 19 tunnel in Fra
nce and the DNW in The Netherlands. The rotor was instrumented with miniatu
re blade-mounted pressure transducers and was tested on the same rotor test
stand located within the flow of both open-jet wind tunnels. In-the-Bow ro
tor acoustic signatures and selected on-blade dynamic pressure signatures a
re presented for each facility and discussed in relation to the differences
in tunnel geometry, tunnel flow quality, and the aeroacoustic characterist
ics of each facility. This comparison shows that low background noise level
s, a large in-the-Bow anechoic measurement space, and low inflow turbulence
to the rotor are necessary to yield high quality aerodynamic and acoustic
data. The best match of acoustic data between the two facilities occurs whe
n the tip-path plane of the rotor is chosen to match closely dynamic blade-
surface-mounted pressures. Achieving a good match between scaled wind-tunne
l acoustics and in-Eight measurements are shown to be more difficult: Agree
ment is reasonably good at low advance ratios but marginal at higher advanc
e ratios.