Effect of age on the refractive outcome of myopic photorefractive keratectomy

Citation
Sn. Rao et al., Effect of age on the refractive outcome of myopic photorefractive keratectomy, J CAT REF S, 26(4), 2000, pp. 543-546
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Optalmology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY
ISSN journal
08863350 → ACNP
Volume
26
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
543 - 546
Database
ISI
SICI code
0886-3350(200004)26:4<543:EOAOTR>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of age on the outcome of myopic photorefrac tive keratectomy (PRK). Settings University-based refractive surgery practice. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 197 eyes that had PRK for myopia was p erformed. Four groups of patients were compared: Group 1, patients <30 year s (n = 35); Group 2, patients 31 to 40 years (n = 56); Group 3, patients 41 to 50 years (n = 47); Group 4, patients >50 years (n = 59). The percentage of eyes with an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better and 20/40 or better and the percentage of eyes with spherical correction within +/-0.5 a nd +/-1.0 diopter (D) of the attempted correction were derived for each age group. The percentage of patients overcorrected and undercorrected by 1.0 D or more in each age group was also calculated. Results: The difference between the percentage of patients who achieved a v isual acuity of 20/20 or better in Group 4 and in the younger groups was st atistically significant at 3 months (P = .02) but not at 6 months (P = .70) and 12 months (P = .55). The difference between the percentage of patients who achieved an acuity of 20/40 or better was not significant at any time. The difference between the percentage of patients who were within +/-0.5 D of intended correction in Group 4 and in the younger groups was statistica lly significant at 3 months (P = .001), 6 months (P = .006), and 12 months (P = .008); the difference between the percentage of patients who were with in +/-1.0 D of intended correction was not significant at any time. The dif ference between the percentage of patients overcorrected and undercorrected by 1.0 D or more in Group 4 and in the younger groups was not significant at any time. Conclusions: In the 3 younger groups, age did not significantly affect visu al outcome or predictability. However, there was a significant difference b etween Group 4 and the 3 younger groups in predictability of the refractive outcome at 3, 6, and 12 months. Age may play a role in the outcome of refr active surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000; 26:543-546 (C) 2000 ASCRS and ESCRS.