Gg. Kamath et al., Visual outcome with the Array multifocal intraocular lens in patients withconcurrent eye disease, J CAT REF S, 26(4), 2000, pp. 576-581
Purpose: To evaluate whether the distance visual outcome with the Array(R)
multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) is comparable to that of a monofocal IOL
in eyes with concurrent disease and to assess whether these eyes benefit fr
om the IOL's multifocality.
Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Arrowe Park Hospital, Wirral, United
Kingdom.
Methods: This prospective study comprised 133 eyes of 111 patients with cat
aract and concurrent disease such as macular degeneration, glaucoma, and di
abetic retinopathy. Eighty-one eyes (70 patients) received an Array multifo
cal IOL after phacoemulsification. A control group of 52 eyes (41 patients)
received a monofocal. IOL of similar design (AMO SI-40NB). Visual outcomes
in terms of uncorrected and best corrected distance and near acuities were
evaluated.
Results: in both the multifocal and the monofocal IOL groups, the number of
eyes achieving a best corrected visual acuity of 6/12 and N8 or better (55
and 37 eyes, respectively) was comparable (P greater than or equal to .999
; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.152 to 0.172). There was a borderline sta
tistically significant difference in the number of eyes achieving an uncorr
ected visual acuity of 6/12 or better and N8 or better in the multifocal IO
L (11 eyes) and monofocal (2 eyes) groups (P = .047, 95% CI -0.007 to 0.196
). A significantly higher number of eyes in the multifocal group (40 eyes)
than in the monofocal IOL group (4 eyes) achieved a distance-corrected acui
ty of 6/12 and N8 or better (P = .0001; 95% CI 0.274 to 0.539).
Conclusions: The Array multifocal IOL produced distance visual outcomes com
parable bie to those of the AMO SI-40NB monofocal IOL in patients with conc
urrent eye disease. A significant proportion of these patients benefited fr
om the IOL's multifocality. Management of associated eye disease was not co
mpromised by the nature of the IOL. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000; 26:576-58
1 (C) 2000 ASCRS and ESCRS.