A formula for diversity: a review of critical care curricula

Citation
J. Scholes et al., A formula for diversity: a review of critical care curricula, J CLIN NURS, 9(3), 2000, pp. 382-390
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING
ISSN journal
09621067 → ACNP
Volume
9
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
382 - 390
Database
ISI
SICI code
0962-1067(200005)9:3<382:AFFDAR>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
This paper is based on a documentary analysis and literature review of crit ical care nursing commissioned by the English National Board for Nursing, M idwifery and Health Visiting. Five critical care programmes were included in the analysis: ENB 100, 124, 199, 176/183, and 415. In total, 105 curricula were reviewed from 30 instit utions. Data were extracted and analysed using an adapted grounded theory approach. The documentary analysis was supplemented by two telephone surveys with le cturers (n=84) and clinical managers (n=81). There was great diversity in the programmes in terms of the academic level at which the courses were set, module configuration, approaches to practice assessment and the amount of student effort for the same professional awar d. Diversity arose because of different university module formulae, different methods to differentiate level 2 and level 3 practice, different views abou t the purpose of the course, and an attempt to make the programmes increasi ngly flexible to accommodate a heterogeneous student population. Documentary analysis has its limitations, and although the research team we re able to check out issues with lecturers throughout the analysis, they we re unable to capture the lived experience of the curriculum. A second study has been commissioned by the ENB to explore how these issues influence pra ctice.