This paper is based on a documentary analysis and literature review of crit
ical care nursing commissioned by the English National Board for Nursing, M
idwifery and Health Visiting.
Five critical care programmes were included in the analysis: ENB 100, 124,
199, 176/183, and 415. In total, 105 curricula were reviewed from 30 instit
utions.
Data were extracted and analysed using an adapted grounded theory approach.
The documentary analysis was supplemented by two telephone surveys with le
cturers (n=84) and clinical managers (n=81).
There was great diversity in the programmes in terms of the academic level
at which the courses were set, module configuration, approaches to practice
assessment and the amount of student effort for the same professional awar
d.
Diversity arose because of different university module formulae, different
methods to differentiate level 2 and level 3 practice, different views abou
t the purpose of the course, and an attempt to make the programmes increasi
ngly flexible to accommodate a heterogeneous student population.
Documentary analysis has its limitations, and although the research team we
re able to check out issues with lecturers throughout the analysis, they we
re unable to capture the lived experience of the curriculum. A second study
has been commissioned by the ENB to explore how these issues influence pra
ctice.