J. Broekroelofs et al., Creatinine-based estimation of rate of long term renal function loss in lung transplant recipients. Which method is preferable?, J HEART LUN, 19(3), 2000, pp. 256-262
Background: Progressive renal function loss during long-term follow up is c
ommon after lung transplantation and close monitoring is warranted, Since c
hanges in creatinine generation and excretion may occur after lung transpla
ntation, the reliability of creatinine-based methods of renal function asse
ssment to serial measurements of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were comp
ared in this population.
Methods: Renal function with serial measurements of GFR by iothalamate clea
rance every 6 months after transplantation was studied in a cohort of 40 lu
ng transplant recipients with at least 24 months of follow up, transplanted
between November 1990 and October 1995 in this center. The correlation bet
ween the rate of renal function loss calculated from the slope of GFR and t
he following creatinine-based indices: 1/S-creatinine, Cockcroft clearance
and Levey estimation were analyzed, The absolute difference between GFR and
Cockcroft clearance and Levey estimation pre- post-transplantation at seve
ral points was also studied.
Results: The slopes of 1/S-creatinine (r = 0.85), Cockcroft clearance (r =
0.86), and the Levey estimation (r = 0.84) correlated significantly with th
e slope of GFR as measured by iothalamate clearance. However, all creatinin
e-based slopes underestimate the rate of GFR loss. Cockcroft clearance and
the reciprocal value of serum creatinine do not detect small GFR losses. Du
ring long-term follow up a time-dependent discrepancy between Cockcroft cle
arance, Levey estimation and GFR was observed which may partially explain t
he observations for this population.
Conclusion: Creatinine-based slopes correlate with GFR slopes after lung tr
ansplantation, but consistently underestimate the rate of GFR decline. The
Levey estimation is the most sensitive method used to detect small GFR loss
es and may be preferable when no GFR measurement is available. In special c
onditions when an accurate renal function assessment is needed true GFR may
be necessary.