Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: which arm?

Citation
Jc. O'Shea et Mb. Murphy, Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: which arm?, J HUM HYPER, 14(4), 2000, pp. 227-230
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION
ISSN journal
09509240 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
227 - 230
Database
ISI
SICI code
0950-9240(200004)14:4<227:ABPMWA>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
To determine the effects of routinely selecting the nondominant arm for amb ulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) on estimates of patients' blood pr essure (BP) and to evaluate the practise of using manual BP from one arm an d ambulatory BP from the other on the estimation of white coat effect (WCE) , an observational study was conducted in 10 volunteers, exhibiting an inte rarm resting clinic systolic BP (SBP) difference greater than or equal to 1 0 mm Hg. The main outcome measures were: (i) average ambulatory SBP measure d on right and left arm simultaneously during 24 h, and (ii) estimate of WC E derived, by current practise, as the difference between the referral clin ic BP (the higher of the manual readings from both arms) and ambulatory non -dominant arm BP, contrasted with the WCE calculated as the difference betw een clinic and ambulatory readings from the same arm (the arm with the high er manual readings). The supine referral clinic SBP was 16 +/- 6 mm Hg high er in the right compared with the left arm, Average 24 h ambulatory SBP was 6 +/- 7 mm Hg higher in the right arm (range +17 to -3 mm Hg), P = 0.025. Diastolic BP measurements mirrored the systolic findings. One-third of the WCE, estimated by current practise, could be attributed to inconsistency in the choice of arm for BP measurement. Thus, inconsistency in the selection of arms for BP measurement, by different techniques, may confound estimati on of patients' cardiovascular morbidity risk.