Critics contend that corporate news organizations are destroying democracy
because they place more emphasis on profits than on information diversity a
nd other nonprofit goals considered crucial for creating or maintaining a p
olitical democracy. Research shows that corporate news organizations tend t
o be more profitable than entrepreneurial news organizations; however, they
actually place less emphasis on profits and more on product quality and ot
her nonprofit goals. More importantly, the "critical corporate model" appea
rs to contain a logical flaw, the "approved contradiction," which claims th
at professional managers should maximize profits more than the owners. This
claim contradicts the managerial revolution hypothesis that expects corpor
ate organizations to place less emphasis on profits as power and control in
modem organizations shifts from the owners to professional managers and te
chnocrats. This article reviews the managerial revolution hypothesis and co
ncludes that attempts to dismiss it outright are premature.