Ds. Lalush et Bmw. Tsui, Performance of ordered-subset reconstruction algorithms under conditions of extreme attenuation and truncation in myocardial SPECT, J NUCL MED, 41(4), 2000, pp. 737-744
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
We studied the bias and variance characteristics of the ordered-subset expe
ctation maximization (OSEM) and rescaled block-iterative EM (RBIEM) iterati
ve reconstruction algorithms in myocardial SPECT under extreme, but realist
ic, conditions. Methods: We used the 2-dimensional mathematic cardiac torso
phantom to simulate 2 patient anatomies: a large male with a raised diaphr
agm and a female with large breast size, approximating extreme cases of att
enuation conditions found in the clinic. For each anatomy, realistic (TI)-T
-201 projection data were simulated for a 180 degrees acquisition are. Thre
e cases of truncation for a 90 degrees-configured dual detector system were
simulated: no truncation, moderate truncation, and extreme truncation. For
each case, an ensemble of 250 noise simulations was generated, and each no
isy dataset was reconstructed with the OSEM and RBIEM algorithms. The recon
structions modeled only the effects of nonuniform attenuation and used a ra
nge of subset configurations. Over the ensemble, we computed means and vari
ances of activity in 8 regions of interest (ROIs) in the heart as a functio
n of iteration. Results: Under conditions of no truncation and moderate tru
ncation, the results from OSEM and RBIEM were very close to those from maxi
mum-likelihood EM (MLEM); in all cases, the difference in ROI means was <2.
5%, For extreme truncation, the errors increased to as much as 11% with OSE
M, but these were no greater than the errors for MLEM under the same condit
ions. The OSEM algorithm with 2 views per subset was found to result in muc
h higher variance of ROI estimates for the same bias as compared with RBIEM
or OSEM with 4 or more views per subset. Conclusion: The OSEM and RBIEM al
gorithms are at least as robust to highly attenuating patients and truncati
on as MLEM algorithm and can be adequate substitutes for MLEM, even in extr
eme cases. Clinical users should apply the smallest number of subsets that
can be accommodated by allowable processing time to reduce image noise and
variance in quantitative estimates.