Transdermal drug delivery using electroporation. II. Factors influencing skin reversibility in electroporative delivery of terazosin hydrochloride inhairless rats
A. Sharma et al., Transdermal drug delivery using electroporation. II. Factors influencing skin reversibility in electroporative delivery of terazosin hydrochloride inhairless rats, J PHARM SCI, 89(4), 2000, pp. 536-544
A previous study indicated that the parameters governing the performance of
electroporative delivery to the skin, are voltage, pulse length, number of
pulses and electrode area.(1) This article describes a study in which the
reversibility of the electroporation technique is evaluated with in vitro m
ethods. The skin's reversal from an enhanced permeation mode as a result of
electroporation to the base level was used as an index to understand the m
echanism of drug delivery and also as a preliminary indicator of safety. Ma
ximum delivery of the model drug, terazosin hydrochloride, occurred during
the pulsing. Electroporative delivery with a wire electrode (small-area ele
ctrode, 0.56 cm(2)) using 20 pulses at U-skin,U-0 88 V, and pulse length 20
ms, did not cause any damage to the skin. Increasing the pulse length to 6
0 ms, while keeping the rest of the parameters fixed, caused a visible chan
ge in the external appearance of the skin. However, with the use of a spira
l electrode (large-area electrode, 2.74 cm(2)) at 60-ms pulse length, there
was minimal damage to the skin. This may be attributed to the more uniform
flow of current over the whole skin area. The large-area electrode require
d a smaller electrode voltage, U-electrode,U-O for any given U-skin,U-O and
also delivered nearly double the instantaneous power density compared with
the small-area electrode. These findings indicate that using shorter pulse
s and large-area electrodes is a safer technique than large pulses and smal
l-area electrodes when electroporation is used to enhance skin's permeabili
ty for drug delivery. (C) 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmaceut
ical Association J Pharm Sci 89: 536-544, 2000.