Transdermal drug delivery using electroporation. II. Factors influencing skin reversibility in electroporative delivery of terazosin hydrochloride inhairless rats

Citation
A. Sharma et al., Transdermal drug delivery using electroporation. II. Factors influencing skin reversibility in electroporative delivery of terazosin hydrochloride inhairless rats, J PHARM SCI, 89(4), 2000, pp. 536-544
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
ISSN journal
00223549 → ACNP
Volume
89
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
536 - 544
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3549(200004)89:4<536:TDDUEI>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
A previous study indicated that the parameters governing the performance of electroporative delivery to the skin, are voltage, pulse length, number of pulses and electrode area.(1) This article describes a study in which the reversibility of the electroporation technique is evaluated with in vitro m ethods. The skin's reversal from an enhanced permeation mode as a result of electroporation to the base level was used as an index to understand the m echanism of drug delivery and also as a preliminary indicator of safety. Ma ximum delivery of the model drug, terazosin hydrochloride, occurred during the pulsing. Electroporative delivery with a wire electrode (small-area ele ctrode, 0.56 cm(2)) using 20 pulses at U-skin,U-0 88 V, and pulse length 20 ms, did not cause any damage to the skin. Increasing the pulse length to 6 0 ms, while keeping the rest of the parameters fixed, caused a visible chan ge in the external appearance of the skin. However, with the use of a spira l electrode (large-area electrode, 2.74 cm(2)) at 60-ms pulse length, there was minimal damage to the skin. This may be attributed to the more uniform flow of current over the whole skin area. The large-area electrode require d a smaller electrode voltage, U-electrode,U-O for any given U-skin,U-O and also delivered nearly double the instantaneous power density compared with the small-area electrode. These findings indicate that using shorter pulse s and large-area electrodes is a safer technique than large pulses and smal l-area electrodes when electroporation is used to enhance skin's permeabili ty for drug delivery. (C) 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmaceut ical Association J Pharm Sci 89: 536-544, 2000.