Qualitative urinalysis methods of monitoring cocaine use may over-dete
ct frequency of use, possibly decreasing the ability of clinical trial
s to detect effective treatments. Quantitative urinalysis and newly de
veloped criteria for identifying new cocaine use were evaluated as alt
ernative measures of cocaine use. Urine specimens collected in a cocai
ne dosing study in nan-treatment-seeking subjects (n=5) and a cocaine
treatment trial (n=37) were analyzed for the cocaine metabolite, benzo
ylecgonine, with qualitative and quantitative methods. Pharmacokinetic
criteria ('New Use' rules) were applied to quantitative data to ident
ify occasions of new cocaine use. Results were compared to known cocai
ne administrations in the laboratory study and to self-reported drug u
se and qualitative urinalysis for subjects in the clinical trial. New
Use criteria correctly identified cocaine administrations in the cocai
ne dosing study in all but a small number of specimens. In the clinica
l trial, quantitative urinalysis and estimated New Uses provided more
information about patterns and frequency of use than qualitative urina
lysis in the different treatment conditions in the clinical trial. Int
erpretation of quantitative urinalysis with New Use rules appears to b
e a useful method for monitoring treatment outcome and may be more acc
urate than traditional qualitative urinalysis in estimating frequency
of cocaine use.