Since sounds may induce physiological and behavioural changes in animals, i
t is necessary to assess and define the acoustic environment in laboratory
animal facilities. Sound studies usually express sound levels as unweighted
linear sound pressure levels. However, because a linear scale does not tak
e account of hearing sensitivity-which may differ widely both between and w
ithin species at various frequencies-the results may be spurious. In this s
tudy a novel sound pressure level weighting for rats, R-weighting, was calc
ulated according to a rat's hearing sensitivity. The sound level of a white
noise signal was assessed using R-weighting, with H-weighting tailored for
humans, A-weighting and linear sound pressure level combined with the resp
onse curves of two different loudspeakers. The sound signal resulted in dif
ferent sound levels depending on the weighting and the type of loudspeaker.
With a tweeter speaker reproducing sounds at high frequencies audible to a
rat, R- and A-weightings gave similar results, but the H-weighted sound le
vels were lower. With a middle-range loudspeaker, unable to reproduce high
Frequencies, R-weighted sound showed the lowest sound levels. In conclusion
, without a correct weighting system and proper equipment, the final sound
level of an exposure stimulus can differ by several decibels from that inte
nded. To achieve reliable and comparable results, standardization of sound
experiments and assessment of the environment in animal facilities is a nec
essity. Hence, the use of appropriate species-specific sound pressure level
weighting is essential. R-weighting for rats in sound studies is recommend
ed.