Relationship between the different methods to calculate Kt/V

Citation
Jl. Teruel et al., Relationship between the different methods to calculate Kt/V, NEFROLOGIA, 20(1), 2000, pp. 72-78
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
NEFROLOGIA
ISSN journal
02116995 → ACNP
Volume
20
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
72 - 78
Database
ISI
SICI code
0211-6995(200001/02)20:1<72:RBTDMT>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
Introduction: There are several shortcut formulas to calculate Kt/V, the mo st widely used because of its simplicity is the logarithmic formula propose d by Lowrie in 1983. The DOQI report recommends use of the formula proposed by Daugirdas's in 1993 to estimate the Kt/V, it must be greater than or eq ual to 1.2. The aim of the present work was to analyse the concordance betw een the second generation Daugirdas's formula and the other shortcut formul as. Material and metods: In 208 hemodialysis sessions performed on 61 patients, Kt/V was estimated by thirteen formulas: 10 single-pool modeling and three double-pool modeling. Results: The Kt/V values obtained by Daugirdas's formula was different from those obtained with the other single-pool based formulas (p < 0.01). When the dialysis sessions were classified in 4 groups according to the Kt/V val ues calculated by Daugirdas's formula, most of the single-pool formulas gav e Kt/V values statistically different from those given by Daugirda's formul a in all ranges examined. The concordance among Kt/V calculated by every on e of the single-pool formulas and Daugirdas's formula was variable. The hig hest agreement was with Keshaviah's and Lowrie's 1992 formulas and the lowe st with Calzavare's and Lowrie's 1983 formulas. The linear multivariate ana lysis showed that the two factors which influenced the concordance were the Kt/V value obtained by the Daugirdas's formula, and the quotient between t he postdialysis body weight and the ultrafiltration rate. Despite the weak concordance with Daugirdas's formula, the Kt/V obtained by Lowrie's 1983 formula and the urea reduction ratio (URR) are still useful tools to monitor the adequacy of dialysis: a Kt/V > 1.065 calculated by the Lowrie's 1983 formula and a PRV > 65% are equivalent to a Kt/V greater tha n or equal to 1.2 calculated by Daugirdas's formula. Conclusions: The shortcut formulas used to calculate Kt/V give different re sults with high intermethod variability. When Kt/V is reported it is absolu tely necessary to indicate the formula used to calculate it. The Kt/V obtai ned by Lowrie's 1983 formula and the URR are useful tools to monitor dialys is adequancy.