We provide informal psychophysical support for a strategy where bottom-up f
eatures guide attention toward a target, and the top-down path interprets h
ypothetical shapes at the target location-as opposed to a dominant top-down
approach. In our survey, for which we used the familiar picture of a Dalma
tian dog against a dappled background, (i) 75% of subjects initially found
a bulging body which overlaps that of the dog, but final 'top-down' percept
s were unexpected: nearly all subjects assigned an incorrect head and limbs
to the body; (ii) after random rotation of texture elements overlapping co
mputed features only 45% of subjects reported a bulging body, with a few ad
ding limbs etc. The picture of the Dalmatian dog must therefore contain man
y bottom-up features-a top-down strategy may find 'incorrect' targets at co
rrect target locations. Computational support for these claims is more easi
ly constructed than one may expect. We could compute at least two bottom-up
features, both useful in 3-D surface interpolation from 2-D scenes, which
yielded significant values at the location of the Dalmatian dog: anisotropi
c texture compression and affine texture distortion cues. We therefore conc
lude that the role of top-down processing is overstated in a traditional ex
ample such as the Dalmatian dog picture.