FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY EVALUATIONS OF ADOLES CENTS AND YOUNG-ADULTS IN GERMANY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION-105-JGG - PUNISHMENT VERSUS THERAPEUTIC SUPPORT

Authors
Citation
Mm. Weber et U. Ruth, FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY EVALUATIONS OF ADOLES CENTS AND YOUNG-ADULTS IN GERMANY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION-105-JGG - PUNISHMENT VERSUS THERAPEUTIC SUPPORT, Fortschritte der Neurologie, Psychiatrie, 65(6), 1997, pp. 247-255
Citations number
45
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Neurology",Psychiatry
ISSN journal
07204299
Volume
65
Issue
6
Year of publication
1997
Pages
247 - 255
Database
ISI
SICI code
0720-4299(1997)65:6<247:FPEOAC>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
105 of the the German Jugendgerichtsgesetz (JGG, law on criminal cases involving offenders between 14 and 17 years of age) allows the use of this special law also for offenders between 18 and 21 years of age if they can be considered juveniles with regard to their personal develo pment or the type of crime they have committed. Assessment of the ''ma turity'' of young people in this age group has been the subject of gre at controversy in forensic psychiatry since the first JGG went into ef fect in 1953. In spite of numerous attempts to operationalize the term ''Jugendlicher'', for example in the Marburg guidelines, it has not y et been possible to establish clear-cut criteria defining the characte ristics of those who are juveniles in the sense of the JGG. Neither ch ild and adolescent psychiatry nor criminal law nor criminology has pro vided an adequate basis for such a definition. The wide range of discr etionary decisions in forensic psychiatry and the associated lack of l egal uniformity may, however, be a necessary prerequisite for an adequ ate assessment of an individual case. Although the chances of a change in criminal law governing those between 18 and 21 are small, creation of a law specifically for this age group, with a separation of the ed ucational-therapeutic aspects from the punishment aspects, could be a great help to those preparing expert opinions in forensic psychiatry a nd to the juvenile courts because it would necessitate greater clarity in decisions relating to this group of offenders. Elimination of Sect ion 105 JGG and the subsequent use of either general criminal law or t hat governing those under age 18 only, which has been proposed repeate dly, is not recommended.