In this paper we investigate intergroup differentiation in different social
contexts. Although low group status motivates group members to display bia
ses favoring the in-group, the awareness that others perceive their group,
as having low-status may prevent them front openly claiming in-group superi
ority. The interplay between these two considerations may account for incon
sistency in findings in the literature regarding displays of in-group favor
itism in lower-status-groups. In two experiments we investigate whether peo
ple rate their group differently (1) in private and in public situations, (
2) in intragroup and in intergroup contexts, and (3) when their strength of
in-group identification differs Results show that members of lower-status
groups are more likely to acknowledge in-group inferiority in public than i
n private situations. Furthermore, strength of identification affects the r
elative importance of different audiences: High identifiers adapt their res
ponses in an intragroup situation, while low identifiers are more sensitive
to the audience in an intergroup context.