Lp. D'Andrea et al., The effect of continued posterior spinal growth on sagittal contour in patients treated by anterior instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis, SPINE, 25(7), 2000, pp. 813-817
Study Design. Retrospective analysis of radiographs on a prospective cohort
of patients undergoing anterior instrumentation for thoracic idiopathic sc
oliosis,
Objectives. To analyze the change in sagittal profile after growth.
Summary of Background Data. The authors previously reported some advantages
of anterior instrumentation for treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis
. However, post surgery hyperkyphosis has resulted in some patients, especi
ally those who were skeletally immature at the time of surgery.
Methods. Inclusion criteria required that participants have thoracic idiopa
thic scoliosis treated with anterior instrumentation and a confirmed solid
fusion, no rod breakage, and a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. The 47
patients meeting the criteria were divided into a study group of 10 patient
s who were Risser 0 at the time of surgery and a control group of 37 patien
ts who were Risser 1 to 5. Progressive sagittal kyphosis was defined as an
increase of 10 degrees or more (T5-T12) after surgery.
Results. Sagittal progression greater than 10 degrees (average, 15 degrees)
occurred in 6 of 10 patients (60%) in the study group (Risser 0). Five pat
ients progressed from 10 degrees to 19 degrees, and one patient from 20 deg
rees to 30 degrees. In contrast, sagittal progression occurred in only 10 o
f 37 patients (27%) in the control group (Risser 1 to 5).
Conclusions. Some patients with thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis tr
eated with anterior instrumentation may be at risk for progressive sagittal
kyphosis secondary to growth. Skeletal immaturity (Risser 0) appears to be
a risk factor. In these immature patients, preserving the sagittal profile
with intervertebral spacers, rigid rods, and hone graft (allowing for an a
verage 15 degrees increase of kyphosis with growth) may be appropriate.